Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37422475›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Global environmental implications of atmospheric methane removal through chlorine-mediated chemistry-climate interactions.

Qinyi Li, Daphne Meidan, Peter Hess, Juan A Añel, Carlos A Cuevas, Scott Doney, Rafael P Fernandez, Maarten van Herpen, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Matthew S Johnson and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Potential Air Quality Side-Effects of Emitting HEnvironmental science & technology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Qinyi Li *Department of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid, 28006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5146-5831
Daphne Meidan *Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7746-4979
Peter HessDepartment of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Juan A AñelDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid, 28006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2448-4647
Carlos A CuevasDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid, 28006, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-5460
Scott DoneyDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-2437
Rafael P FernandezInstitute for Interdisciplinary Science (ICB), National Research Council (CONICET), FCEN-UNCuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.
Maarten van HerpenAcacia Impact Innovation BV, Acacialaan 9, 5384 BB, Heesch, The Netherlands.
Lena Höglund-IsakssonPollution Management group (PM), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2361, Laxenburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7514-3135
Matthew S JohnsonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3645-3955
Douglas E KinnisonAtmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.
Jean-François LamarqueClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4225-5074
Thomas RöckmannInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584CC, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-8968
Natalie M MahowaldDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. mahowald@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2873-997X
Alfonso Saiz-LopezDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid, 28006, Spain. a.saiz@csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-1581
Atkins (United States) · USNSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · USConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESCornell University · USHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis · ATUniversidade de Vigo · ESUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Virginia · USUtrecht University · NL

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC-2016- COG 726349 CLIMAHAL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric methane is both a potent greenhouse gas and photochemically active, with approximately equal anthropogenic and natural sources. The addition of chlorine to the atmosphere has been proposed to mitigate global warming through methane reduction by increasing its chemical loss. However, the potential environmental impacts of such climate mitigation remain unexplored. Here, sensitivity studies are conducted to evaluate the possible effects of increasing reactive chlorine emissions on the methane budget, atmospheric composition and radiative forcing. Because of non-linear chemistry, in order to achieve a reduction in methane burden (instead of an increase), the chlorine atom burden needs to be a minimum of three times the estimated present-day burden. If the methane removal target is set to 20%, 45%, or 70% less global methane by 2050 compared to the levels in the Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 scenario (RCP8.5), our modeling results suggest that additional chlorine fluxes of 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year, respectively, are needed. The results show that increasing chlorine emissions also induces significant changes in other important climate forcers. Remarkably, the tropospheric ozone decrease is large enough that the magnitude of radiative forcing decrease is similar to that of methane. Adding 630, 1250, and 1880 Tg Cl/year to the RCP8.5 scenario, chosen to have the most consistent current-day trends of methane, will decrease the surface temperature by 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 °C by 2050, respectively. The quantity and method in which the chlorine is added, its interactions with climate pathways, and the potential environmental impacts on air quality and ocean acidity, must be carefully considered before any action is taken.

Indexed as

Air PollutionOzoneAtmosphereChlorineClimateHalogensMethaneChlorineHalogensMethaneOzone

Identifiers

PMID37422475
PMCPMC10329632
OpenAlexW4383620734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.