ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023
Incidence, risk factors, and clinical sequelae of incomplete stent apposition after sirolimus-eluting stent.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Incomplete stent apposition has been documented after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. However, its clinical sequelae remain controversial. To identify the incidence and its clinical consequences of ISA, IVUS was performed on 78 patients. In spite of well apposition immediately after the deployment, late stent malapposition occurred after 6-months follow-up. A total of 7 patients who received SES showed ISA. There were no significant differences in IVUS measurements between patients with or without ISA. However, there was an increase in external elastic membrane area in ISA group than non-ISA group (19.69 ± 3.50 vs. 15.05 ± 2.56 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.