Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3742157›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology1986

Influence of the optical isomers (+)- and (-)-naloxone on beating frequency, contractile force and action potentials of guinea-pig isolated cardiac preparations.

H Brasch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 1986. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

H Brasch
University of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naloxone in concentrations ranging from 7.5 to 120 mumol l-1 reduced the beating frequency of guinea-pig isolated atria. The ED50 was 7.9 mumol l-1 for the (-)-isomer and 10.8 mumol l-1 for the (+)-isomer. Concentrations up to 120 mumol l-1 of either (-)- or (+)-naloxone did not affect the force of contraction of left atria stimulated at 1 Hz. In concentrations from 30 to 120 mumol l-1 (-)-naloxone increased the action potential (AP) duration and the functional refractory period (FRP) of papillary muscles. The resting membrane potential and the AP amplitude remained unchanged, while a small decrease of Vmax was seen with the larger drug concentrations. The influence of (+)-naloxone (120 mumol l-1) was comparable to that of the (-)-isomer. The influence of morphine (120 mumol l-1) on papillary muscle AP was small. AP duration and FRP showed a marginal prolongation while Vmax was slightly decreased. (-)-Naloxone 60 mumol l-1 had no effect on slow-response APs of K+-depolarized papillary muscles. Slow-response APs were abolished by verapamil (1 mumol l-1). In left atrial strips the prolongation of the AP duration produced by 120 mumol l-1 of either (-)- or (+)-naloxone resembled the drug effect in papillary muscles. Most of the observed changes can be explained by an inhibition of the time-dependent membrane K+ outward current, an effect of naloxone that may be classified as a Class III antiarrhythmic action. Apparently this effect is not mediated by stereospecific opioid receptors.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsDepression, ChemicalElectric StimulationGuinea PigsHeart AtriaHeart RateIsomerismMaleMembrane PotentialsMorphineMyocardial ContractionNaloxonePotassiumVerapamilMorphineNaloxonePotassiumVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID3742157
PMCPMC1917083
OpenAlexW2048620008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.