Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421511›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2023

The effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on patient-reported subjective oral dryness: a systematic review focusing on prevalence, severity and distress.

Marjolein S Bulthuis, Lucky L A van Gennip, Ewald M Bronkhorst, Nicole M A Blijlevens, Marie-Charlotte D N J M Huysmans, Stephanie J M van Leeuwen, Renske Z Thomas

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Cancer therapy-related salivary dysfunction.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marjolein S BulthuisDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marjolein.Bulthuis@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7170-2806
Lucky L A van GennipDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ewald M BronkhorstDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nicole M A BlijlevensDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marie-Charlotte D N J M HuysmansDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stephanie J M van LeeuwenDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Renske Z ThomasDepartment of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present systematic review is to assess the prevalence and severity of and distress caused by xerostomia over time in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for papers published between January 2000 and May 2022. Clinical studies were included if patient-reported subjective oral dryness was reported in adult autologous or allogeneic HSCT recipients. Risk of bias was assessed according to a quality grading strategy published by the oral care study group of the MASCC/ISOO, resulting in a score between 0 (highest risk of bias) and 10 (lowest risk of bias). Separate analysis focused on autologous HSCT recipients, allogeneic HSCT recipients receiving a myeloablative conditioning (MAC), and those receiving a reduced intensity conditioning (RIC).

resultsSearches yielded 1792 unique records; 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality scores ranged between 1 and 7, with a median score of 4. The prevalence, severity, and distress of xerostomia increased shortly after HSCT. Severity of xerostomia in allogeneic MAC recipients was higher compared to allogeneic RIC recipients 2-5 months post-HSCT (mean difference: 18 points on 0-100 scale, 95% CI: 9-27); after 1-2 years, there was no significant difference anymore.

conclusionThe prevalence of xerostomia in HSCT recipients is high in comparison to the general population. The severity of complaints is raised during the first year post-HSCT. The intensity of the conditioning plays a key role in the short-term development of xerostomia, while factors affecting the recovery in the long term remain largely unknown.

Indexed as

Graft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationXerostomiaAdultHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPrevalenceTransplantation ConditioningHematopoietic stem cell transplantationPatient-reported oral drynessSubjective mouth drynessSystematic reviewXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID37421511
PMCPMC10329604
OpenAlexW4383620348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.