Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421493›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Factors Associated with Venous Thromboembolism Development in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.

Kyril L Cole, Sarah Nguyen, Savannah Gelhard, Jeremy Hardy, Janet Cortez, Jade M Nunez, Sarah T Menacho, Ramesh Grandhi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Comparative Analysis of Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury of Different Severity.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyril L Cole *School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sarah Nguyen *Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Savannah GelhardSchool of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jeremy HardySchool of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Janet CortezUniversity of Utah Health Trauma Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jade M NunezDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Sarah T MenachoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ramesh GrandhiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. neuropub@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-6083
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous thromboembolic (VTE) events are a major concern in trauma and intensive care, with the prothrombotic state caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI) increasing the risk in affected patients. We sought to identify critical demographic and clinical variables and determine their influence on subsequent VTE development in patients with TBI.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with data retrospectively collected from 818 patients with TBI admitted to a level I trauma center in 2015-2020 and placed on VTE prophylaxis.

resultsThe overall VTE incidence was 9.1% (7.6% deep vein thrombosis, 3.2% pulmonary embolism, 1.7% both). The median time to diagnosis was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) for deep vein thrombosis and 5 days (interquartile range 3-12) for pulmonary embolism. Compared with those who did not develop VTE, patients who developed VTE were younger (44 vs. 54 years, p = 0.02), had more severe injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 7.5 vs. 14, p = 0.002, Injury Severity Score 27 vs. 21, p < 0.001), were more likely to have experienced polytrauma (55.4% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.001), more often required neurosurgical intervention (45.9% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.007), more frequently missed ≥ 1 dose of VTE prophylaxis (39.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.04), and were more likely to have had a history of VTE (14.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.008). Univariate analysis demonstrated that 4-6 total missed doses predicted the highest VTE risk (odds ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 1.53-10.86, p = 0.005).

conclusionsOur study highlights patient-specific factors that are associated with VTE development in a cohort of patients with TBI. Although many of these are unmodifiable patient characteristics, a threshold of four missed doses of chemoprophylaxis may be particularly important in this critical patient population because it can be controlled by the care team. Development of intrainstitutional protocols and tools within the electronic medical record to avoid missed doses, particularly among patients who require operative interventions, may result in decreasing the likelihood of future VTE formation.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticPulmonary EmbolismVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAnticoagulantsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnticoagulantsClot riskDosingProphylaxisTraumatic brain injuryVenous thromboembolic events

Identifiers

PMID37421493
OpenAlexW4383620568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.