ArticleNeurocritical care2024
Factors Associated with Venous Thromboembolism Development in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Venous thromboembolic events in traumatic brain injury. Does timing of prophylaxis matter? A single-center retrospective cohort study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2026Article
- Computed Tomography Yield and Predictors of Pulmonary Embolism in Mechanically Ventilated Patients-A Retrospective Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Frequency and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in patients with space-occupying brain infarction and decompressive craniectomy.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- Assessment of risk factors related to early occurrence of deep vein thrombosis after TBI using nomogram model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Neurocritically Ill Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A comparative analysis of three risk assessment scales for predicting venous thromboembolism in traumatic brain injury patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Pulmonary Embolism: Risks, Prevention, Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Intensive Inpatient Neurorehabilitation Unit.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Comparison of different machine learning classification models for predicting deep vein thrombosis in lower extremity fractures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and Outcomes of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Regional Trauma Center in Incheon, Korea, 2018-2022.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury of Different Severity.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolic (VTE) events are a major concern in trauma and intensive care, with the prothrombotic state caused by traumatic brain injury (TBI) increasing the risk in affected patients. We sought to identify critical demographic and clinical variables and determine their influence on subsequent VTE development in patients with TBI.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study with data retrospectively collected from 818 patients with TBI admitted to a level I trauma center in 2015-2020 and placed on VTE prophylaxis.
resultsThe overall VTE incidence was 9.1% (7.6% deep vein thrombosis, 3.2% pulmonary embolism, 1.7% both). The median time to diagnosis was 7 days (interquartile range 4-11) for deep vein thrombosis and 5 days (interquartile range 3-12) for pulmonary embolism. Compared with those who did not develop VTE, patients who developed VTE were younger (44 vs. 54 years, p = 0.02), had more severe injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 7.5 vs. 14, p = 0.002, Injury Severity Score 27 vs. 21, p < 0.001), were more likely to have experienced polytrauma (55.4% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.001), more often required neurosurgical intervention (45.9% vs. 30.5%, p = 0.007), more frequently missed ≥ 1 dose of VTE prophylaxis (39.2% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.04), and were more likely to have had a history of VTE (14.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.008). Univariate analysis demonstrated that 4-6 total missed doses predicted the highest VTE risk (odds ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval 1.53-10.86, p = 0.005).
conclusionsOur study highlights patient-specific factors that are associated with VTE development in a cohort of patients with TBI. Although many of these are unmodifiable patient characteristics, a threshold of four missed doses of chemoprophylaxis may be particularly important in this critical patient population because it can be controlled by the care team. Development of intrainstitutional protocols and tools within the electronic medical record to avoid missed doses, particularly among patients who require operative interventions, may result in decreasing the likelihood of future VTE formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.