Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421464›Full record

ReviewMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2023

Bridging mouse and human anatomies; a knowledge-based approach to comparative anatomy for disease model phenotyping.

Jesús Ruberte, Paul N Schofield, John P Sundberg, Alfonso Rodriguez-Baeza, Ana Carretero, Colin McKerlie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nonhuman primate models of pediatric viral diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jesús RuberteCenter for Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. jesus.ruberte@uab.es.
Paul N SchofieldThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
John P SundbergThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Alfonso Rodriguez-BaezaDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana CarreteroCenter for Animal Biotechnology and Gene Therapy, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Colin McKerlieThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory mouse is the foremost mammalian model used for studying human diseases and is closely anatomically related to humans. Whilst knowledge about human anatomy has been collected throughout the history of mankind, the first comprehensive study of the mouse anatomy was published less than 60 years ago. This has been followed by the more recent publication of several books and resources on mouse anatomy. Nevertheless, to date, our understanding and knowledge of mouse anatomy is far from being at the same level as that of humans. In addition, the alignment between current mouse and human anatomy nomenclatures is far from being as developed as those existing between other species, such as domestic animals and humans. To close this gap, more in depth mouse anatomical research is needed and it will be necessary to extent and refine the current vocabulary of mouse anatomical terms.

Indexed as

Animals, DomesticMammalsAnatomy, ComparativeAnimalsHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID37421464
PMCPMC10382392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.