Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421463›Full record

ArticleCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2023

Evolutionary shifts in pheromone receptors contribute to speciation in four Helicoverpa species.

Song Cao, Chen Shi, Bing Wang, Peng Xiu, Yong Wang, Yang Liu, Guirong Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. A covalent recognition strategy enables conspecific mate identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Song Cao *State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Chen Shi *Department of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Bing WangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Peng XiuDepartment of Engineering Mechanics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Yong WangCollege of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China. yongwang_isb@zju.edu.cn.
Yang LiuState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. yangliu@ippcaas.cn.
Guirong WangState Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China. wangguirong@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3794-0106
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNInstitute of Plant Protection · CNZhejiang University · CNZhejiang International Studies University · CN

Funding

Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund CAAS-ZDRW202108China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020M680785Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China K20220228National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFF1200404National Natural Science Foundation of China 11932017National Natural Science Foundation of China 32072509National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130089National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272540Shenzhen Science and Technology Program KQTD20180411143628272Special Funds for Science Technology Innovation and Industrial Development of Shenzhen Dapeng New District PT202101-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male moths utilize their pheromone communication systems to distinguish potential mates from other sympatric species, which contributes to maintaining reproductive isolation and even drives speciation. The molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of pheromone communication systems are usually studied between closely-related moth species for their similar but divergent traits associated with pheromone production, detection, and/or processing. In this study, we first identified the functional differentiation in two orthologous pheromone receptors, OR14b, and OR16, in four Helicoverpa species, Helicoverpa armigera, H. assulta, H. zea, and H. gelotopoeon. To understand the substrate response specificity of these two PRs, we performed all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of OR14b and OR16 based on AlphaFold2 structural prediction, and molecular docking, allowing us to predict a few key amino acids involved in substrate binding. These candidate residues were further tested and validated by site-directed mutagenesis and functional analysis. These results together identified two hydrophobic amino acids at positions 164 and 232 are the determinants of the response specificity of HarmOR14b and HzeaOR14b to Z9-14:Ald and Z9-16:Ald by directly interacting with the substrates. Interestingly, in OR16 orthologs, we found that position 66 alone determines the specific binding of Z11-16:OH, likely via allosteric interactions. Overall, we have developed an effective integrated method to identify the critical residues for substrate selectivity of ORs and elucidated the molecular mechanism of the diversification of pheromone recognition systems.

Indexed as

MothsReceptors, PheromoneAnimalsMaleMolecular Docking SimulationPheromonesPheromonesReceptors, PheromoneAlphaFold2HelicoverpaMolecular dockingMolecular dynamics simulationsPheromone receptorSite-directed mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID37421463
PMCPMC11072504
OpenAlexW4383619905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.