Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421449›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

Are the non-weight bearing guidelines for the after treatment of calcaneal fractures still decisive? A Dutch survey among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons.

Coen Verstappen, Mitchell L S Driessen, Pishtiwan H S Kalmet, Erik Hermans, Michael J R Edwards, Martijn Poeze

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The role of early weight bearing in the aftertreatment of unilateral displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a systematic review and pooled analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Coen VerstappenDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Coen.Verstappen@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0254-7002
Mitchell L S DriessenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-5422
Pishtiwan H S KalmetDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3478-6932
Erik HermansDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5884-3954
Michael J R EdwardsDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martijn PoezeDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5005-1285

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current rehabilitation for patients with surgically treated displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) consists of non-weightbearing for 8-12 weeks. The purpose of the present survey was to investigate the current pre-, peri- and post-operative practices among Dutch foot and ankle surgeons. Moreover, it aims to analyze whether surgeons comply to the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) guidelines and which decision criteria were used in the determination of the start of weightbearing.

methodsA survey was distributed among Dutch trauma and orthopaedic surgeons to determine the most common practices in postoperative weightbearing in patients with DIACFs.

results75 surgeons responded to the survey. 33% of the respondents adhered to the AO guidelines. 4% of the respondents strictly followed non-weightbearing guidelines, while 96% interpret the AO guidelines or their local protocol freely, in any frequency. When respondents tended to deviate from the AO guidelines or local protocol, a good patients' compliance to therapy was expected. 83% of the respondents started weightbearing on the fracture, based on reported patient complaints. 87% of the respondents did not see any relation between early weightbearing and the occurrence of complications, including loosening of osteosynthesis materials.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that there is limited consensus on the rehabilitation for DIACFs. Moreover, it shows that most surgeons are inclined to interpret the current (AO) guideline or their own local protocol freely. New guidelines, supported with well-founded literature, could help surgeons in a more appropriate daily practice in weightbearing for the rehabilitation of calcaneal fractures.

Indexed as

Ankle InjuriesFoot InjuriesFractures, BoneOrthopedicsOrthopedic SurgeonsFracture Fixation, InternalHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesDisplaced intraarticular calcaneal fracturesPermissive weightbearingPostoperative treatmentRehabilitationSurveyTrauma patients

Identifiers

PMID37421449
PMCPMC10771614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.