Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421311›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2023

Pilot testing of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Registry.

Sherry L Grace, Sana Elashie, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Theodoros Papasavvas, Farzana Hashmi, Gabriela de Melo Ghisi, Jorge Lara Vargas, Mohammed Al-Hashemi, Karam Turk-Adawi

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sherry L GraceSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Sana ElashieDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Masoumeh SadeghiCardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-4350-3591
Theodoros PapasavvasDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Farzana HashmiDepartment of Rheumatology, Fatima Memorial Hospital & FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan.
Gabriela de Melo GhisiSchool of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.
Jorge Lara VargasServicio de Rehabilitación Cardiaca, Departamento de Cardiocirugía, Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, Ciudad de México 03104, México.
Mohammed Al-HashemiDepartment of Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Karam Turk-AdawiDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAQatar University · QACMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity Health Network · CAYork University · CA

Funding

Qatar University IRCC-2020-005York University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation developed an International Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) Registry (ICRR) to support CR programs in low-resource settings to optimize care provision and patient outcomes. This study assessed implementation of the ICRR, site data steward experience with on-boarding and data entry, and patient acceptability. Multimethod observational pilot involves (I) analysis of ICRR data from three centers (Iran, Pakistan, and Qatar) from inception to May 2022, (II) focus group with on-boarded site data stewards (also from Mexico and India), and (III) semistructured interviews with participating patients. Five hundred sixty-seven patients were entered. Based on volumes at each program, 85.6% of patients were entered in ICRR. 99.3% patients approached consented to participate. The average time to enter data at pre- and follow-up assessments by source was 6.8-12.6 min. Of 22 variables preprogram, completion was 89.5%. Among patients with any follow-up data, of four program-reported variables, completion was 99.0% in program completers and 51.5% in none; of 10 patient-reported variables, completion was 97.0% in program completers and 84.8% in none. The proportion of patients with any follow-up data was 84.8% in program completers, with 43.6% of noncompleters having any data entered other than completion status. Twelve data stewards participated in the focus group. Main themes were valuable on-boarding process, data entry, process of engaging patients, and benefits of participation. Thirteen patients were interviewed. Themes were good understanding of the registry, positive experience providing data, and value of lay summary and eagerness for annual assessment. Feasibility and data quality of ICRR were demonstrated.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesHumansIndiaIranRegistriescardiac rehabilitationfeasibility studypilot testquality improvementregistry

Identifiers

PMID37421311
PMCPMC10329404
OpenAlexW4383612977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.