Trial reportCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023
Trends in participant race and sex reporting in lung cancer phase III clinical trials.
Trial report in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in participant race and sex reporting in lung cancer phase III clinical trials.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Trial
- Racial and Ethnic Representation Reporting in Orthopaedic Research.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Let's talk about sex: Survival among females and males in a real-world cohort treated with pembrolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Weaning performance prediction in lactating sows using machine learning, for precision nutrition and intelligent feeding.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025Article
- Biological characterization and clinical significance of cuproptosis-related genes in lung adenocarcinoma.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of calcium signaling pathway-related biomarkers in T1 and T2 lymph node metastatic gastric cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- One Small Step by the National Institutes of Health Can be a Giant Leap for Persons With Disability.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024Article
- Exploring Demographic Representation and Reporting in Lung Cancer Clinical Trials with Canadian Sites from 2013 to 2023.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Identifying Populations at Risk for Lung Cancer Mortality from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2001-2018) Using the 2021 USPSTF Screening Guidelines.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Article
- Bridging racial and ethnic disparities in cancer research.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials are an essential part of advancing care for cancer patients. Historically, however, racial minorities and females have been underrepresented in these trials. Efforts like the National Institute of Health Revitalization Act attempted to mitigate these disparities, but despite these efforts, they continue to exist. These disparities can subsequently lead to minorities and females receiving suboptimal care.
aimsThe purpose of our study was to understand the changing trends in reporting of participant race and sex as a demographic variable in phase III lung cancer clinical trials published over the last 35 years given these consequences of poor representation. METHODS AND
resultsA total of 426 articles reporting the results of phase III lung cancer clinical trials published from 1984 to 2019 were identified in PubMed. From these articles, data on participant sex and race were collected from the demographic tables to construct the database for this study. This database was subsequently used to determine the rate of reporting of demographic factors like race and sex and the participation trends over the time of minority and female participation in lung cancer phase III clinical trials. The SciPy Stats package for Python was used to calculate descriptive statistics, 95% confidence intervals, two sample t-test, one-way analysis of variance test, and Pearson's correlation coefficients. The Matplotlib package for Python was used for figure generation. Only 137 (32.2%) of the 426 studies analyzed reported the race of participants. Among those studies, we found that the mean participation rate of White participants was significantly higher (82.65%; p < .001). We found a decrease in African American participants and an increase in Asian participants over time. When looking at sex, we found that although the rate of male participation (69.02%) was significantly higher than that of female participation (30.98%), female participation has improved with time at a rate of 0.65% per year.
conclusionWe found that the reporting and participation of minority races continue to lag that of other demographic factors like sex in phase III clinical trials in lung cancer. Based on our analysis, we note a decline in participation of African Americans in lung cancer phase III clinical trials despite the rising incidence of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.