ArticleBiophysical journal2023
Influence of electric field, blood velocity, and pharmacokinetics on electrochemotherapy efficiency.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Boolean network and meshless simulations for the comparison of transport and reaction mechanisms arising in one-short tri-exponential and uniform infusion electrochemotherapeutic treatments.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Effects of ultra-fast nanosecond electric pulses on mitochondria transmembrane potential and oxidation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of external magnetic and electric fields on blood flow and drug transport in a cardiovascular tube.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The convective delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs in cancerous tissues is directly proportional to the blood perfusion rate, which in turns can be transiently reduced by the application of high-voltage and short-duration electric pulses due to vessel vasoconstriction. However, electric pulses can also increase vessel wall and cell membrane permeabilities, boosting the extravasation and cell internalization of drug. These opposite effects, as well as possible adverse impacts on the viability of tissues and endothelial cells, suggest the importance of conducting in silico studies about the influence of physical parameters involved in electric-mediated drug transport. In the present work, the global method of approximate particular solutions for axisymmetric domains, together with two solution schemes (Gauss-Seidel iterative and linearization+successive over-relaxation), is applied for the simulation of drug transport in electroporated cancer tissues, using a continuum tumor cord approach and considering both the electropermeabilization and vasoconstriction phenomena. The developed global method of approximate particular solutions algorithm is validated with numerical and experimental results previously published, obtaining a satisfactory accuracy and convergence. Then, a parametric study about the influence of electric field magnitude and inlet blood velocity on the internalization efficacy, drug distribution uniformity, and cell-kill capacity of the treatment, as expressed by the number of internalized moles into viable cells, homogeneity of exposure to bound intracellular drug, and cell survival fraction, respectively, is analyzed for three pharmacokinetic profiles, namely one-short tri-exponential, mono-exponential, and uniform. According to numerical results, the trade-off between vasoconstriction and electropermeabilization effects and, consequently, the influence of electric field magnitude and inlet blood velocity on the assessment parameters considered here (efficacy, uniformity, and cell-kill capacity) is different for each pharmacokinetic profile deemed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.