Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37421098›Full record

ReviewMicromachines2023

A Brief Review on Cerium Oxide (CeO

Ishita Allu, Ajay Kumar Sahi, Pooja Kumari, Karunya Sakhile, Alina Sionkowska, Shravanya Gundu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Genipin-crosslinked CeORSC advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in chemistry · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ishita AlluDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University College of Engineering (UCE), Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.
Ajay Kumar SahiFaculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jurija Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1035-8562
Pooja KumariTissue Engineering and Biomicrofluidics Laboratory, School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi 221005, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Karunya SakhileDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, National University of Science and Technology, Muscat 2322, Oman.
Alina SionkowskaFaculty of Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Jurija Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1551-2725
Shravanya GunduDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University College of Engineering (UCE), Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007, Telangana, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1821-7307
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLOsmania University · INBanaras Hindu University · INMuscat College · OM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of wound healing is complex and involves the interaction of multiple cells, each with a distinct role in the inflammatory, proliferative, and remodeling phases. Chronic, nonhealing wounds may result from reduced fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis, and cellular immunity, often associated with diabetes, hypertension, vascular deficits, immunological inadequacies, and chronic renal disease. Various strategies and methodologies have been explored to develop nanomaterials for wound-healing treatment. Several nanoparticles such as gold, silver, cerium oxide and zinc possess antibacterial properties, stability, and a high surface area that promotes efficient wound healing. In this review article, we investigate the effectiveness of cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeO

Indexed as

cerium oxidescaffoldsskinwound healing

Identifiers

PMID37421098
PMCPMC10143419
OpenAlexW4366188493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.