ArticleMicromachines2023
A Method for Rapid, Quantitative Evaluation of Particle Sorting in Microfluidics Using Basic Cytometry Equipment.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper describes, in detail, a method that uses flow cytometry to quantitatively characterise the performance of continuous-flow microfluidic devices designed to separate particles. Whilst simple, this approach overcomes many of the issues with the current commonly utilised methods (high-speed fluorescent imaging, or cell counting via either a hemocytometer or a cell counter), as it can accurately assess device performance even in complex, high concentration mixtures in a way that was previously not possible. Uniquely, this approach takes advantage of pulse processing in flow cytometry to allow quantitation of cell separation efficiencies and resulting sample purities on both single cells as well as cell clusters (such as circulating tumour cell (CTC) clusters). Furthermore, it can readily be combined with cell surface phenotyping to measure separation efficiencies and purities in complex cell mixtures. This method will facilitate the rapid development of a raft of continuous flow microfluidic devices, will be helpful in testing novel separation devices for biologically relevant clusters of cells such as CTC clusters, and will provide a quantitative assessment of device performance in complex samples, which was previously impossible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.