ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A Study on the Influence of Sensors in Frequency and Time Domains on Context Recognition.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Few-Shot Optimization for Sensor Data Using Large Language Models: A Case Study on Fatigue Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptive AI for context and activity recognition remains a relatively unexplored field due to difficulty in collecting sufficient information to develop supervised models. Additionally, building a dataset for human context activities "in the wild" demands time and human resources, which explains the lack of public datasets available. Some of the available datasets for activity recognition were collected using wearable sensors, since they are less invasive than images and precisely capture a user's movements in time series. However, frequency series contain more information about sensors' signals. In this paper, we investigate the use of feature engineering to improve the performance of a Deep Learning model. Thus, we propose using Fast Fourier Transform algorithms to extract features from frequency series instead of time series. We evaluated our approach on the ExtraSensory and WISDM datasets. The results show that using Fast Fourier Transform algorithms to extract features performed better than using statistics measures to extract features from temporal series. Additionally, we examined the impact of individual sensors on identifying specific labels and proved that incorporating more sensors enhances the model's effectiveness. On the ExtraSensory dataset, the use of frequency features outperformed that of time-domain features by 8.9 p.p., 0.2 p.p., 39.5 p.p., and 0.4 p.p. in Standing, Sitting, Lying Down, and Walking activities, respectively, and on the WISDM dataset, the model performance improved by 1.7 p.p., just by using feature engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.