Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420896›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning-Based Sensor Data Fusion for Animal Monitoring: Scoping Review.

Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Lazcano, Ismael Edrein Espinosa-Curiel, Jorge Alberto Ríos-Martínez, Francisco Alejandro Madera-Ramírez, Humberto Pérez-Espinosa

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multi-Modality Sheep Face Recognition Based on Deep Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Analyzing Cattle Activity Patterns with Ear Tag Accelerometer Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Alberto Aguilar-LazcanoCICESE-UT3, Tepic 63173, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-5097
Ismael Edrein Espinosa-CurielCICESE-UT3, Tepic 63173, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-3256
Jorge Alberto Ríos-MartínezComputer Science Department, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Merida 97000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-0515
Francisco Alejandro Madera-RamírezComputer Science Department, Faculty of Mathematics, Autonomous University of Yucatan, Merida 97000, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4495-2017
Humberto Pérez-EspinosaCICESE-UT3, Tepic 63173, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2331-1800
Universidad Tecnológica de Nayarit · MXAutonomous University of Yucatán · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of technology, such as the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence, has significantly advanced many fields of study. Animal research is no exception, as these technologies have enabled data collection through various sensing devices. Advanced computer systems equipped with artificial intelligence capabilities can process these data, allowing researchers to identify significant behaviors related to the detection of illnesses, discerning the emotional state of the animals, and even recognizing individual animal identities. This review includes articles in the English language published between 2011 and 2022. A total of 263 articles were retrieved, and after applying inclusion criteria, only 23 were deemed eligible for analysis. Sensor fusion algorithms were categorized into three levels: Raw or low (26%), Feature or medium (39%), and Decision or high (34%). Most articles focused on posture and activity detection, and the target species were primarily cows (32%) and horses (12%) in the three levels of fusion. The accelerometer was present at all levels. The findings indicate that the study of sensor fusion applied to animals is still in its early stages and has yet to be fully explored. There is an opportunity to research the use of sensor fusion for combining movement data with biometric sensors to develop animal welfare applications. Overall, the integration of sensor fusion and machine learning algorithms can provide a more in-depth understanding of animal behavior and contribute to better animal welfare, production efficiency, and conservation efforts.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsBiometryCattleFemaleHorsesMovementanimal computer interactionanimalsmachine learningsensorsensor fusion

Identifiers

PMID37420896
PMCPMC10305307
OpenAlexW4381336855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.