Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420891›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Using Deep Learning Architectures for Detection and Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Cheena Mohanty, Sakuntala Mahapatra, Biswaranjan Acharya, Fotis Kokkoras, Vassilis C Gerogiannis, Ioannis Karamitsos, Andreas Kanavos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Toward Reliable Diabetic Retinopathy Screening.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheena MohantyDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunication, Biju Patnaik University of Technology, Rourkela 769012, Odisha, India.
Sakuntala MahapatraDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, Trident Academy of Technology, Bhubaneswar 751016, Odisha, India.
Biswaranjan AcharyaDepartment of Computer Engineering-AI, Marwadi University, Rajkot 360003, Gujarat, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6506-9207
Fotis KokkorasDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7884-9739
Vassilis C GerogiannisDepartment of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9895-7606
Ioannis KaramitsosDepartment of Graduate and Research, Rochester Institute of Technology, Dubai 341055, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-6106-6423
Andreas KanavosDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9964-4134

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common complication of long-term diabetes, affecting the human eye and potentially leading to permanent blindness. The early detection of DR is crucial for effective treatment, as symptoms often manifest in later stages. The manual grading of retinal images is time-consuming, prone to errors, and lacks patient-friendliness. In this study, we propose two deep learning (DL) architectures, a hybrid network combining VGG16 and XGBoost Classifier, and the DenseNet 121 network, for DR detection and classification. To evaluate the two DL models, we preprocessed a collection of retinal images obtained from the APTOS 2019 Blindness Detection Kaggle Dataset. This dataset exhibits an imbalanced image class distribution, which we addressed through appropriate balancing techniques. The performance of the considered models was assessed in terms of accuracy. The results showed that the hybrid network achieved an accuracy of 79.50%, while the DenseNet 121 model achieved an accuracy of 97.30%. Furthermore, a comparative analysis with existing methods utilizing the same dataset revealed the superior performance of the DenseNet 121 network. The findings of this study demonstrate the potential of DL architectures for the early detection and classification of DR. The superior performance of the DenseNet 121 model highlights its effectiveness in this domain. The implementation of such automated methods can significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of DR diagnosis, benefiting both healthcare providers and patients.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyBlindnessHealth PersonnelHumansNeural Networks, Computerconvolutional neural networksdata balanceDenseNet 121diabetic retinopathyVGG16XGBoost classifier

Identifiers

PMID37420891
PMCPMC10301863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.