ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Detection of Missing Bolts for Engineering Structures in Natural Environment Using Machine Vision and Deep Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-based detection of bolts and bolt-missing defects in multi-angle and complex background scenarios.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review of Non-Destructive Testing for Wind Turbine Bolts.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of an accurate and efficient method for detecting missing bolts in engineering structures is crucial. To this end, a missing bolt detection method that leveraged machine vision and deep learning was developed. First, a comprehensive dataset of bolt images captured under natural conditions was constructed, which improved the generality and recognition accuracy of the trained bolt target detection model. Second, three deep learning network models, namely, YOLOv4, YOLOv5s, and YOLOXs, were compared, and YOLOv5s was selected as the bolt target detection model. With YOLOv5s as the target recognition model, the bolt head and bolt nut had average precisions of 0.93 and 0.903, respectively. Third, a missing bolt detection method based on perspective transformation and IoU was presented and validated under laboratory conditions. Finally, the proposed method was applied to an actual footbridge structure to test its feasibility and effectiveness in real engineering scenarios. The experimental results showed that the proposed method could accurately identify bolt targets with a confidence level of over 80% and detect missing bolts under different image distances, perspective angles, light intensities, and image resolutions. Moreover, the experimental results on a footbridge demonstrated that the proposed method could reliably detect the missing bolt even at a shooting distance of 1 m. The proposed method provided a low-cost, efficient, and automated technical solution for the safety management of bolted connection components in engineering structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.