Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420743›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Role-Driven Clustering of Stakeholders: A Study of IoT Security Improvement.

Latifah Almalki, Amany Alnahdi, Tahani Albalawi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Latifah AlmalkiDepartment of Computer Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5879-9968
Amany AlnahdiDepartment of Computer Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-2133-5745
Tahani AlbalawiDepartment of Computer Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh 11432, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to address the challenges of managing the vast amount of data generated by Internet of Things (IoT) devices by categorizing stakeholders based on their roles in IoT security. As the number of connected devices increases, so do the associated security risks, highlighting the need for skilled stakeholders to mitigate these risks and prevent potential attacks. The study proposes a two-part approach, which involves clustering stakeholders according to their responsibilities and identifying relevant features. The main contribution of this research lies in enhancing decision-making processes within IoT security management. The proposed stakeholder categorization provides valuable insights into the diverse roles and responsibilities of stakeholders in IoT ecosystems, enabling a better understanding of their interrelationships. This categorization facilitates more effective decision making by considering the specific context and responsibilities of each stakeholder group. Additionally, the study introduces the concept of weighted decision making, incorporating factors such as role and importance. This approach enhances the decision-making process, enabling stakeholders to make more informed and context-aware decisions in the realm of IoT security management. The insights gained from this research have far-reaching implications. Not only will they benefit stakeholders involved in IoT security, but they will also assist policymakers and regulators in developing effective strategies to address the evolving challenges of IoT security.

Indexed as

EcosystemInternet of ThingsAwarenessCluster AnalysisProblem Solvingclusteringdecision makingIoT securityrolestakeholders

Identifiers

PMID37420743
PMCPMC10301810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.