Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420742›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

IoT Sensor Challenges for Geothermal Energy Installations Monitoring: A Survey.

Michal Prauzek, Tereza Kucova, Jaromir Konecny, Monika Adamikova, Karolina Gaiova, Miroslav Mikus, Pavel Pospisil, Darius Andriukaitis, Mindaugas Zilys, Birgitta Martinkauppi and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michal PrauzekDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1348-1328
Tereza KucovaDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7169-5116
Jaromir KonecnyDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0496-2915
Monika AdamikovaDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Karolina GaiovaDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-9267-2335
Miroslav MikusDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Pavel PospisilDepartment of Geotechnics and Underground Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3558-5654
Darius AndriukaitisDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-8917
Mindaugas ZilysDepartment of Electronics Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, 44249 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Birgitta MartinkauppiSchool of Technology and Innovations, University of Vaasa, 65200 Vaasa, Finland.
Jiri KoziorekDepartment of Cybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7138-887X

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme No. 856670Student Grant System, VSB-TU Ostrava SP2023/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geothermal energy installations are becoming increasingly common in new city developments and renovations. With a broad range of technological applications and improvements in this field, the demand for suitable monitoring technologies and control processes for geothermal energy installations is also growing. This article identifies opportunities for the future development and deployment of IoT sensors applied to geothermal energy installations. The first part of the survey describes the technologies and applications of various sensor types. Sensors that monitor temperature, flow rate and other mechanical parameters are presented with a technological background and their potential applications. The second part of the article surveys Internet-of-Things (IoT), communication technology and cloud solutions applicable to geothermal energy monitoring, with a focus on IoT node designs, data transmission technologies and cloud services. Energy harvesting technologies and edge computing methods are also reviewed. The survey concludes with a discussion of research challenges and an outline of new areas of application for monitoring geothermal installations and innovating technologies to produce IoT sensor solutions.

Indexed as

Geothermal EnergyInternet of ThingsCloud ComputingInformation TechnologyTechnologyedge computingenergy harvestinggeothermal energygeothermal sensorsIoT

Identifiers

PMID37420742
PMCPMC10300865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.