ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Active Learning Optimisation of Binary Coded Metasurface Consisting of Wideband Meta-Atoms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transparent and Ultra-Thin Flexible Checkerboard Metasurface for Radar-Infrared Bi-Stealth.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The design of a metasurface array consisting of different unit cells with the objective of minimizing its radar cross-section is a popular research topic. Currently, this is achieved by conventional optimisation algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimisation (PSO). One major concern of such algorithms is the extreme time complexity, which makes them computationally forbidden, particularly at large metasurface array size. Here, we apply a machine learning optimisation technique called active learning to significantly speed up the optimisation process while producing very similar results compared to GA. For a metasurface array of size 10 × 10 at a population size of 106, active learning took 65 min to find the optimal design compared to genetic algorithm, which took 13,260 min to return an almost similar optimal result. The active learning optimisation strategy produced an optimal design for a 60 × 60 metasurface array 24× faster than the approximately similar result generated by GA technique. Thus, this study concludes that active learning drastically reduces computational time for optimisation compared to genetic algorithm, particularly for a larger metasurface array. Active learning using an accurately trained surrogate model also contributes to further lowering of the computational time of the optimisation procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.