Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420549›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Combined CNN and RNN Neural Networks for GPR Detection of Railway Subgrade Diseases.

Huan Liu, Shilei Wang, Guoqing Jing, Ziye Yu, Jin Yang, Yong Zhang, Yunlong Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Huan LiuSchool of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Shilei WangInfrastructure Inspection Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China.
Guoqing JingSchool of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9655-2229
Ziye YuInstitute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing 100081, China.
Jin YangSchool of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China.
Yong ZhangRailway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Co., Ltd., Beijing 100081, China.
Yunlong GuoFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-1833
China Academy of Railway Sciences · CNChina University of Geosciences (Beijing) · CNBeijing Jiaotong University · CNChina Earthquake Administration · CNDelft University of Technology · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vehicle-mounted ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used to non-destructively inspect and evaluate railway subgrade conditions. However, existing GPR data processing and interpretation methods mostly rely on time-consuming manual interpretation, and limited studies have applied machine learning methods. GPR data are complex, high-dimensional, and redundant, in particular with non-negligible noises, for which traditional machine learning methods are not effective when applied to GPR data processing and interpretation. To solve this problem, deep learning is more suitable to process large amounts of training data, as well as to perform better data interpretation. In this study, we proposed a novel deep learning method to process GPR data, the CRNN network, which combines convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN). The CNN processes raw GPR waveform data from signal channels, and the RNN processes features from multiple channels. The results show that the CRNN network achieves a higher precision at 83.4%, with a recall of 77.3%. Compared to the traditional machine learning method, the CRNN is 5.2 times faster and has a smaller size of 2.6 MB (traditional machine learning method: 104.0 MB). Our research output has demonstrated that the developed deep learning method improves the efficiency and accuracy of railway subgrade condition evaluation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerRadarCNNGPRground-penetrating radarRNNsubgrade anomalies

Identifiers

PMID37420549
PMCPMC10304807
OpenAlexW4379796280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.