ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Self-Information Weighting-Based Node Importance Ranking Method for Graph Data.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to their wide application in many disciplines, how to make an efficient ranking for nodes, especially for nodes in graph data, has aroused lots of attention. To overcome the shortcoming that most traditional ranking methods only consider the mutual influence between nodes but ignore the influence of edges, this paper proposes a self-information weighting-based method to rank all nodes in graph data. In the first place, the graph data are weighted by regarding the self-information of edges in terms of node degree. On this base, the information entropy of nodes is constructed to measure the importance of each node and in which case all nodes can be ranked. To verify the effectiveness of this proposed ranking method, we compare it with six existing methods on nine real-world datasets. The experimental results show that our method performs well on all of these nine datasets, especially for datasets with more nodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.