Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420482›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Stock Index Spot-Futures Arbitrage Prediction Using Machine Learning Models.

Yankai Sheng, Ding Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yankai ShengSchool of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2864-8928
Ding MaSchool of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72004173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the development of quantitative finance, machine learning methods used in the financial fields have been given significant attention among researchers, investors, and traders. However, in the field of stock index spot-futures arbitrage, relevant work is still rare. Furthermore, existing work is mostly retrospective, rather than anticipatory of arbitrage opportunities. To close the gap, this study uses machine learning approaches based on historical high-frequency data to forecast spot-futures arbitrage opportunities for the China Security Index (CSI) 300. Firstly, the possibility of spot-futures arbitrage opportunities is identified through econometric models. Then, Exchange-Traded-Fund (ETF)-based portfolios are built to fit the movements of CSI 300 with the least tracking errors. A strategy consisting of non-arbitrage intervals and unwinding timing indicators is derived and proven profitable in a back-test. In forecasting, four machine learning methods are adopted to predict the indicator we acquired, namely Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN), and Long Short-Term Memory neural network (LSTM). The performance of each algorithm is compared from two perspectives. One is an error perspective based on the Root-Mean-Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and goodness of fit (R

Indexed as

Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN)Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)Long Short-Term Memory neural network (LSTM)spot–futures arbitrage

Identifiers

PMID37420482
PMCPMC9601484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.