SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2023
Efficacy and safety of Cook staged Extubation Set in patients with difficult airway: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced Extubation Strategy in a Pediatric Difficult Airway: Successful Use of a Cook Staged Extubation Set.Cureus · 2026Article
- Awake Fiberoptic Intubation for Severe Tracheal Compression Caused by a Multinodular Goiter: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of airway education in anesthesia for head and neck surgery.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2025Review
- All India Difficult Airway Association 2025 guidelines for extubation of the "at-risk" airway.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Thyromental Height Test as a Method for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Patients with Obesity: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCook Stage extubation is a tool developed by Cook Medical for patients with difficult airways. Multiple clinical studies demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of Cook Stage extubation Set (CSES). Currently, no systematic review evidence has been published in this field. Therefore, this study aimed to review the clinical success rate, safety, and tolerability of CSES in patients with difficult airways.
methodThe inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, and study designs. An electronic search was conducted, and the following databases were used: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Search keywords included difficult airway and CSES. The primary outcome was the CSES clinical success rate.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for Case Series were used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. R studio, version 4.2.2. was used to perform the statistical analysis. The Cochrane Q and I
resultsFive studies were eligible for meta-analysis, and 7 case reports were included for systematic review. The pooled overall CSES clinical success rate was 93% (95% CI: 85%, 97%). The CSES intolerable and complication incidence rates were 9% (95% CI: 5%, 18%) and 5% (95% CI: 2%, 12%), respectively. CSES clinical success rate was influenced by the study center and study design. The success rate of CSES was higher in multicenter and prospective design studies. Seven case reports have documented the successful operation of CSES intubation in obese, tall, oncologist, and pediatric patients. DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis suggested that CSES have achieved a high clinical success rate in adult and pediatric patients with different physical conditions and types of surgery. The results of all original studies and meta-analysis confirmed a remarkably high tolerance rate and low overall complication rate. However, regardless of the tools chosen, a personalized, safe intubation strategy and a highly qualified anesthesiologist should be considered as the fundamental guarantee of a high clinical success rate. Future studies should also focus on the success rate of reintubation using CSES in patients with airway difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.