Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37420166›Full record

Observational studyBMC primary care2023

Roles considered important for hospitalist and non-hospitalist generalist practice in Japan: a survey study.

Taiju Miyagami, Taro Shimizu, Shunsuke Kosugi, Yohei Kanzawa, Kazuya Nagasaki, Hiroyuki Nagano, Toru Yamada, Kazutoshi Fujibayashi, Gautam A Deshpande, Flora Kisuule and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC primary care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Taiju MiyagamiDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taro ShimizuDepartment of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University Hospital, Kitakobayashi 880, Mibu, Shimotsuga, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan. shimizutaro7@gmail.com.
Shunsuke KosugiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yohei KanzawaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Akashi Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Kazuya NagasakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroyuki NaganoDepartment of Healthcare Economics and Quality Management Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Toru YamadaDepartment of General Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujibayashiDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Gautam A DeshpandeDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Flora KisuuleDivision of Hospital Medicine at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susumu TazumaJA Onomichi General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Toshio NaitoDepartment of General Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increased focus on quality and patient safety has led to the evolution of hospitalists. The number of hospitalists covering ward and outpatient care is on the rise in Japan. However, it is unclear what roles hospital workers themselves consider important in their practice. Therefore, this study investigated what hospitalists and non-hospitalist generalists in Japan consider important for the practice of their specialty.

methodsThis was an observational study that included Japanese hospitalists (1) currently working in a general medicine (GM) or general internal medicine department and (2) working at a hospital. Using originally developed questionnaire items, we surveyed the items important to hospitalists and non-hospitalist generalists.

resultsThere were 971 participants (733 hospitalists, 238 non-hospitalist) in the study. The response rate was 26.1%. Both hospitalists and non-hospitalists ranked evidence-based medicine as the most important for their practice. In addition, hospitalists ranked diagnostic reasoning and inpatient medical management as the second and third most important roles for their practice, while non-hospitalists ranked inpatient medical management and elderly care as second and third.

conclusionsThis is the first study investigating the roles Japanese hospitalists consider important and comparing those to that of non-hospitalist generalists. Many of the items that hospitalists considered important were those that hospitalists in Japan are working on within and outside academic societies. We found that diagnostic medicine and quality and safety are areas that are likely to see further evolution as hospitalists specifically emphasized on them. In the future, we expect to see suggestions and research for further enhancing the items that hospital workers value and emphasise upon.

Indexed as

HospitalistsHospitalsHumansInternal MedicineJapanSurveys and QuestionnairesGeneral medicineHospitalistNon-hospitalist generalistQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID37420166
PMCPMC10327327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.