ArticleScientific reports2023
Recurrence prediction in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using machine learning of quantitative nuclear features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personalized Prediction of Postoperative Recurrence in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Integrating AI-Based Nuclear Morphometry and Clinical Data.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Radiogenomic correlation of hypoxia-related biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- A clinical audit of adverse post-nephrectomy outcomes in renal cell carcinoma patients at a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia.Journal of nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recurrence of non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may occur early or late after surgery. This study aimed to develop a recurrence prediction machine learning model based on quantitative nuclear morphologic features of clear cell RCC (ccRCC). We investigated 131 ccRCC patients who underwent nephrectomy (T1-3N0M0). Forty had recurrence within 5 years and 22 between 5 and 10 years; thirty-seven were recurrence-free during 5-10 years and 32 were for more than 10 years. We extracted nuclear features from regions of interest (ROIs) using a digital pathology technique and used them to train 5- and 10-year Support Vector Machine models for recurrence prediction. The models predicted recurrence at 5/10 years after surgery with accuracies of 86.4%/74.1% for each ROI and 100%/100% for each case, respectively. By combining the two models, the accuracy of the recurrence prediction within 5 years was 100%. However, recurrence between 5 and 10 years was correctly predicted for only 5 of the 12 test cases. The machine learning models showed good accuracy for recurrence prediction within 5 years after surgery and may be useful for the design of follow-up protocols and patient selection for adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.