ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings2023
SGLT2 Inhibitors Are Associated With Reduced Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: An Analysis of Real-World Data.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Cardiovascular Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of potential approaches for counting person-time in instances where no active comparator is present.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor use in type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a lower rate of atrial arrhythmias in a hospitalized real-world population.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Preventing premature cardiovascular mortality: the role of lifestyle interventions and pharmacotherapy-a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- American Heart Association EPI|Lifestyle Scientific Sessions: 2022 Meeting Highlights.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and other second-line diabetes therapies with risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as conduct head-to-head comparisons between SGLT2 inhibitors. PATIENTS AND
methodsUsing data from the MarketScan databases (January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019), SGLT2 inhibitor users were matched with up to five other second-line therapy users by age, sex, date of enrollment, and date of second-line therapy initiation. The primary composite outcome included stroke, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Hazard ratios were estimated, adjusting for demographics and a propensity score reflecting comorbidities and medications.
resultsIn this study population of 313,396 patients (mean age 53±10 years; 47% female), 9787 incident CVD events occurred over a median follow-up of 1.36 years. After multivariable adjustments, SGLT2 inhibitor users had a lower risk of CVD than other second-line therapy users (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.71). Significant associations were also observed when each CVD outcome was assessed separately. No differences were noted when comparing individual SGLT2 inhibitors.
conclusionSGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a clinically meaningfully lower CVD risk in the real-world setting. In head-to-head comparisons, the different SGLT2 inhibitors were consistent in their protective associations with CVD. This suggests that as a class, SGLT2 inhibitors may have widespread benefit in preventing CVD among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.