Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37419245›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2023

CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 Genotyping Recommendations: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, College of American Pathologists, Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, European Society for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Therapy, and Pharmacogenomics Knowledgebase.

Victoria M Pratt, Larisa H Cavallari, Makenzie L Fulmer, Andrea Gaedigk, Houda Hachad, Yuan Ji, Lisa V Kalman, Reynold C Ly, Ann M Moyer, Stuart A Scott and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacogenetics in pediatric cardiology.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Victoria M PrattPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana. Electronic address: vpratt@iu.edu.
Larisa H CavallariPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Makenzie L FulmerPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Andrea GaedigkPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Research Institute and School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Houda HachadPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Clinical Operations, AccessDx, Houston, Texas.
Yuan JiPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and ARUP Laboratories, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Lisa V KalmanPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Division of Laboratory Systems, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Reynold C LyPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ann M MoyerPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Stuart A ScottPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Clinical Genomics Laboratory, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
Ron H N van SchaikPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Clinical Chemistry/International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Expert Center Pharmacogenetics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Michelle Whirl-CarrilloPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Karen E WeckPharmacogenomics Working Group of the Clinical Practice Committee, Association for Molecular Pathology, Rockville, Maryland; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Indiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Utah · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USErasmus MC · NLMayo Clinic · USMercy Research · USPharmacoGenetics (China) · CNStanford Medicine · USStanford University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-gen Exome Sequencing 2U01HG006487 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERG, JONATHAN S, POWELL, BRADFORD C. · 2012 to 2021
$22.7M
Sparking Advancements in Genomic MedicineU01HG007269 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CAVALLARI, LARISA HUMMA, JOHNSON, JULIE A. · 2013 to 2024
$17.0M
Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis by Genomic Sequencing: A Prospective EvaluationR01HD055651 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Wendy K Chung, Vaidehi Jobanputra · 2007 to 2026
$16.5M
PharmGKB: pharmacogenomics discovery and implementationU24HG010615 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TERI Ellen KLEIN, Michelle Whirl-Carrillo · 2020 to 2026
$9.5M
Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC)U24HG010135 · NHGRI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CAUDLE, KELLY E., KLEIN, TERI ELLEN · 2018 to 2022
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006487NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG007269NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010135NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG010615NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055651
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of the Association for Molecular Pathology Clinical Practice Committee's Pharmacogenomics (PGx) Working Group are to define the key attributes of pharmacogenetic alleles recommended for clinical testing and a minimum set of variants that should be included in clinical PGx genotyping assays. This document series provides recommendations for a minimum panel of variant alleles (tier 1) and an extended panel of variant alleles (tier 2) that will aid clinical laboratories when designing assays for PGx testing. The Association for Molecular Pathology PGx Working Group considered functional impact of the variant alleles, allele frequencies in multiethnic populations, the availability of reference materials, and other technical considerations for PGx testing when developing these recommendations. The goal of this Working Group is to promote standardization of PGx gene/allele testing across clinical laboratories. This document will focus on clinical CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 PGx testing that may be applied to all CYP3A4- and CYP3A5-related medications. These recommendations are not to be interpreted as prescriptive but to provide a reference guide.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3APharmacogeneticsGenotypeHumansPathologistsPathology, MolecularPharmacistsCYP3A4 protein, humanCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3A

Identifiers

PMID37419245
PMCPMC10565868
OpenAlexW4383219503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.