Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37419078›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2023

Concordance of HER2-low scoring in breast carcinoma among expert pathologists in the United Kingdom and the republic of Ireland -on behalf of the UK national coordinating committee for breast pathology.

Mohamed Zaakouk, Cecily Quinn, Elena Provenzano, Clinton Boyd, Grace Callagy, Soha Elsheikh, Joe Flint, Rebecca Millican-Slater, Anu Gunavardhan, Yasmeen Mir and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Repurposing HER2 IHC: Pan-HER2 and Low-HER2.Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Mohamed ZaakoukInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Cancer Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Cecily QuinnDepartment of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Ireland; UCD School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland.
Elena ProvenzanoAddenbrookes Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK; Department of Histopathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Clinton BoydHistopathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Grace CallagyDiscipline of Pathology, University of Galway, School of Medicine, Lambe Institute for Translational Research, Galway, Ireland.
Soha ElsheikhDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; Research Department of Pathology, University College London, Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Joe FlintBirmingham Tissue Analytics, University of Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca Millican-SlaterDepartment of Cellular Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Anu GunavardhanDepartment of Histopathology, Glan Clwyd Hospital Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bodelwyddan, UK.
Yasmeen MirPathology, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Purnima MakhijaPathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Silvana Di PalmaCellular Pathology Department, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Susan PritchardPathology, Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Bruce TanchelCellular Pathology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Emad RakhaHistopathology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Nehal M AtallahHistopathology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK; Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Egypt.
Andrew H S LeeHistopathology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah PinderSchool of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK.
Abeer M ShaabanInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: a.shaaban@bham.ac.uk.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBAddenbrooke's Hospital · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBCairo University · EGGlan Clwyd Hospital · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent clinical evidence showed that breast cancer with low HER2 expression levels responded to trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy. The HER2-low cancers comprise immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1+ and 2+ ISH non-amplified tumours, currently classified as HER2 negative. Little data exists on the reproducibility of pathologists reporting of HER2-low cancer. PATIENT AND

methodsSixteen expert pathologists of the UK National Coordinating Committee for Breast Pathology scored 50 digitally scanned HER2 IHC slides. The overall level of agreement, Fleiss multiple-rater kappa statistics and Cohen's Kappa were calculated. Cases with low concordance were re-scored by the same pathologists after a washout period.

resultsAbsolute agreement was achieved in 6% of cases, all of which scored 3+. Poor agreement was found in 5/50 (10%) of cases. This was due to heterogeneous HER2 expression, cytoplasmic staining and low expression spanning the 10% cut-off value. Highest concordance (86%) was achieved when scores were clustered as 0 versus others. Improvement in kappa of overall agreement was achieved when scores 1+ and 2+ were combined. Inter-observer agreement was moderate to substantial in the whole cohort but fair to moderate in the HER2-low group. Similarly, consensus-observer agreement was substantial to almost perfect in the whole cohort and moderate to substantial in the HER2-low group.

conclusionHER2-low breast cancer suffers from lower concordance among expert pathologists. While most cases can reproducibly be classified, a small proportion (10%) remained challenging. Refining the criteria for reporting and consensus scoring will help select appropriate patients for targeted therapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansIrelandObserver VariationPathologistsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBreast cancerConcordanceConsistencyHER2-LowHER2-UltralowImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID37419078
PMCPMC10382984
OpenAlexW4382461101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.