Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418599›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2023

Shifting Sociodemographic Characteristics of a Phase I Clinical Trial Population at an NCI-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center in the Southeast.

Chloe S Lalonde, Jeffrey M Switchenko, Madhusmita Behera, Mehmet A Bilen, Taofeek K Owonikoko, Jonathan L Kaufman, Ajay K Nooka, Colleen M Lewis, Elise Hitron, Hannah Collins and 4 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Chloe S LalondeDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6775-3299
Jeffrey M SwitchenkoDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-9325
Madhusmita BeheraWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mehmet A BilenWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Taofeek K OwonikokoDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7724-7728
Jonathan L KaufmanWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ajay K NookaWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Colleen M LewisFlorida Cancer Specialists, Tampa, FL, USA.
Elise HitronWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Hannah CollinsWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emma C JudsonWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Olatunji B AleseWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8079-4725
R Donald HarveyWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-1313
Jennifer W CarlisleWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7085-4640

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS P30CA138292NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Racial and ethnic minority populations are consistently under-represented in oncology clinical trials despite comprising a disproportionate share of a cancer burden. Phase I oncology clinical trials pose a unique challenge and opportunity for minority inclusion. Here we compared the sociodemographic characteristics of patients participating in phase 1 clinical trials a National Cancer Institute ( NCI)-designated comprehensive center to all patients at the center, patients with new cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Atlanta and patients with new cancer diagnoses in the state of Georgia. From 2015 to 2020, 2325 patients (43.4% female, 56.6% male) consented to participate in a phase I trial. Grouped self-reported race distribution was 70.3% White, 26.2% Black, and 3.5% other. Of new patient registrations at Winship Cancer Institute (N = 107 497) (50% F, 50% M), grouped race distribution was 63.3% White, 32.0% Black, and 4.7% other. Patients with new cancer diagnoses in metro Atlanta from 2015 to 2016 (N = 31101) were 58.4% White, 37.2% Black, and 4.3% other. Race and sex distribution of phase I patients was significantly different than Winship patients (P < .001). Over time, percent of White patients decreased in both phase I and Winship groups (P = .009 and P < .001, respectively); percentage of females did not change in either group (P = .54 phase I, P = .063 Winship). Although phase I patients were more likely to be White, male, and privately ensured than the Winship cohort, from 2015 to 2020 the percentage of White patients in phase I trials and among all new patients treated at Winship decreased. The intent of characterizing existing disparities is to improve the representation of patients from racial and ethnic minority backgrounds in phase I clinical trials.

Indexed as

EthnicityNeoplasmsFemaleGeorgiaHumansMaleMinority GroupsNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)United StatesClinical triaequityPhase 1

Identifiers

PMID37418599
PMCPMC10712723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.