Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418563›Full record

ReviewJournal of athletic training2023

The Utility of Myotonometry in Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation and Human Performance Programming.

Jared M McGowen, Carrie W Hoppes, Jeff S Forsse, Stephanie R Albin, John Abt, Shane L Koppenhaver

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of athletic training, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Determination of muscle fatigue of operating theatre staff using myotonometric measurements.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of Myotonometric Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Caesarean Section Scar Skin Using the MyotonPRO With an L-Shaped Probe.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jared M McGowenDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX.
Carrie W HoppesArmy-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, San Antonio, TX.
Jeff S ForsseDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX.
Stephanie R AlbinSchool of Physical Therapy, Regis University, Denver, CO.
John AbtChildren's Health Andrews Institute for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Plano, TX.
Shane L KoppenhaverDepartment of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX.
Baylor University · USAndrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine · USRegis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myotonometry is a relatively novel method used to quantify the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties (stiffness, compliance, tone, elasticity, creep, and mechanical relaxation) of palpable musculotendinous structures with portable mechanical devices called myotonometers. Myotonometers obtain these measures by recording the magnitude of radial tissue deformation that occurs in response to the amount of force that is perpendicularly applied to the tissue through a device's probe. Myotonometric parameters such as stiffness and compliance have repeatedly demonstrated strong correlations with force production and muscle activation. Paradoxically, individual muscle stiffness measures have been associated with both superior athletic performance and a higher incidence of injury. This indicates optimal stiffness levels may promote athletic performance, whereas too much or too little may lead to an increased risk of injury. Authors of numerous studies suggested that myotonometry may assist practitioners in the development of performance and rehabilitation programs that improve athletic performance, mitigate injury risk, guide therapeutic interventions, and optimize return-to-activity decision-making. Thus, the purpose of our narrative review was to summarize the potential utility of myotonometry as a clinical tool that assists musculoskeletal clinicians with the diagnosis, rehabilitation, and prevention of athletic injuries.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesMuscle, SkeletalElasticityHumansMechanical Phenomenaclinical decision-makingmuscle stiffnessperformance optimization

Identifiers

PMID37418563
PMCPMC11215642
OpenAlexW4383532034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.