Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418523›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

The ins and outs of membrane bending by intrinsically disordered proteins.

Feng Yuan, Christopher T Lee, Arjun Sangani, Justin R Houser, Liping Wang, Eileen M Lafer, Padmini Rangamani, Jeanne C Stachowiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Polymer sailing on rafts within lipid membranes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Organizing principles underlying COPII-mediated transport.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biophysical modeling of membrane curvature generation and curvature sensing by the glycocalyx.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Making the cut: Multiscale simulation of membrane remodeling.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Feng YuanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6592-1578
Christopher T LeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0670-2308
Arjun SanganiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1144-6844
Justin R HouserDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Liping WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Eileen M LaferDepartment of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0493-6522
Padmini RangamaniDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5953-4347
Jeanne C StachowiakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2501-142X

Funding

Protein Networks as Synergistic Drivers of Membrane RemodelingR35GM139531 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Jeanne Casstevens Stachowiak · 2021 to 2026
$4.0M
Modeling and analysis of the mechanochemical processes that govern clathrin-mediated endocytosisR01GM132106 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RANGAMANI, PADMINI · 2020 to 2024
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM132106NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane curvature is essential to diverse cellular functions. While classically attributed to structured domains, recent work illustrates that intrinsically disordered proteins are also potent drivers of membrane bending. Specifically, repulsive interactions among disordered domains drive convex bending, while attractive interactions drive concave bending, creating membrane-bound, liquid-like condensates. How might disordered domains that contain both repulsive and attractive domains affect curvature? Here, we examined chimeras that combined attractive and repulsive interactions. When the attractive domain was closer to the membrane, its condensation amplified steric pressure among repulsive domains, leading to convex curvature. In contrast, when the repulsive domain was closer to the membrane, attractive interactions dominated, resulting in concave curvature. Further, a transition from convex to concave curvature occurred with increasing ionic strength, which reduced repulsion while enhancing condensation. In agreement with a simple mechanical model, these results illustrate a set of design rules for membrane bending by disordered proteins.

Indexed as

Intrinsically Disordered ProteinsMembranesIntrinsically Disordered Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37418523
PMCPMC10328403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.