Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418442›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Plantar threshold sensitivity assessment using an automated tool-Clinical assessment comparison between a control population without type 2 diabetes mellitus, and populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without neuropathy symptoms.

Vitale Kyle Castellano, Jon Commander, Thomas Burch, Hayden Burch, Jessica Remy, Benjamin Harman, Michael E Zabala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vitale Kyle CastellanoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7260-7229
Jon CommanderInternal Medicine Associates, Opelika, Alabama, United States of America.
Thomas BurchDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Hayden BurchDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Jessica RemyEdward via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Benjamin HarmanEdward via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Michael E ZabalaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Auburn University · USEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is often classified as a loss of sensation in the extremities, particularly in elderly populations. The most common diagnosis technique is with the use of the hand-applied Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. This study's first aim was to quantify and compare sensation on the plantar surface in healthy and type 2 diabetes mellitus populations with the standard Semmes-Weinstein hand-applied methodology and a tool that automates this approach. The second was to evaluate correlations between sensation and the subjects' medical characteristics. Sensation was quantified by both tools, at thirteen locations per foot, in three populations: Group 1-control subjects without type 2 diabetes, Group 2-subjects with type 2 diabetes and with neuropathy symptoms, and Group 3-subjects with type 2 diabetes without neuropathy symptoms. The percentage of locations sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool was calculated. Linear regression analyses between sensation and the subject's age, body mass index, ankle brachial index, and hyperglycemia metrics were performed per group. ANOVAs determined differences between populations. Approximately 22.5% of locations assessed were sensitive to the hand-applied monofilament, yet insensitive to the automated tool. Age and sensation were only significantly correlated in Group 1 (R2 = 0.3422, P = 0.004). Sensation was not significantly correlated with the other medical characteristics per group. Differences in sensation between the groups were not significant (P = 0.063). Caution is recommended when using hand-applied monofilaments. Group 1's sensation was correlated to age. The other medical characteristics failed to corelate with sensation, despite group.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesAgedFootHandHumansSensation

Identifiers

PMID37418442
PMCPMC10328367
OpenAlexW4383506533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.