Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418392›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Bayesian function registration with random truncation.

Yi Lu, Radu Herbei, Sebastian Kurtek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yi LuMathematics and Computer Science Department, Drew University, Madison, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4528-2665
Radu HerbeiDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Sebastian KurtekDepartment of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3832-9496

Funding

Synthesizing Image-derived Heterogeneity with Genomic measurements for Assessing Disease Aggressiveness in Lower Grade GliomasR37CA214955 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KURTEK, SEBASTIAN, RAO, ARVIND · 2018 to 2024
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we develop a new set of Bayesian models to perform registration of real-valued functions. A Gaussian process prior is assigned to the parameter space of time warping functions, and a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm is utilized to explore the posterior distribution. While the proposed model can be defined on the infinite-dimensional function space in theory, dimension reduction is needed in practice because one cannot store an infinite-dimensional function on the computer. Existing Bayesian models often rely on some pre-specified, fixed truncation rule to achieve dimension reduction, either by fixing the grid size or the number of basis functions used to represent a functional object. In comparison, the new models in this paper randomize the truncation rule. Benefits of the new models include the ability to make inference on the smoothness of the functional parameters, a data-informative feature of the truncation rule, and the flexibility to control the amount of shape-alteration in the registration process. For instance, using both simulated and real data, we show that when the observed functions exhibit more local features, the posterior distribution on the warping functions automatically concentrates on a larger number of basis functions. Supporting materials including code and data to perform registration and reproduce some of the results presented herein are available online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID37418392
PMCPMC10328359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.