Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians and nurses at the cape coast teaching hospital in the Central Region of Ghana on spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting.

Julianne Frimpomaa Powell, Isaac Tabiri Henneh, Martins Ekor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julianne Frimpomaa PowellSchool of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-8126
Isaac Tabiri HennehDepartment of Pharmacotherapeutics and Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Martins EkorDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, College of Health and Allied Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-4683-0988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ghana's rate of reporting adverse drug reaction (ADRs) over the past years has consistently been below the WHO standard despite utilizing the spontaneous or voluntary reporting system. While underreporting undermines the pharmacovigilance system and poses a huge threat to public health safety, there is limited information on the perspectives of healthcare workers directly involved in drug administration. The present study investigated the knowledge, attitude and practice of physicians and nurses at the Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH) towards spontaneous reporting of ADRs (SR-ADRs). A descriptive cross-sectional survey was employed in the study. Pre-tested (Cronbach's alpha value of 0.72) and validated questionnaires comprising 37 open-ended and close-ended questions were administered to 44 doctors and 116 nurses at the CCTH who had been practicing for at least six months prior to study. Out of the 160 administered questionnaires, 86 was administered face-to-face and the remaining via e-mails. Descriptive analysis was performed and the results were presented in simple frequencies and percentages. Binary logistic regression model was used to test association of the independent variables with SR-ADRs. With a response rate of 86.4% for physicians and 59.5% for nurses, 38 (35.5%) physicians and 69 (64.5%) nurses completed the questionnaires and returned same. Majority (82.3%, 88) of the respondents knew that it is their responsibility to report ADRs although their knowledge levels was found to be inadequate (that is ≤80%) in majority (66.7%) of the text items that assessed knowledge levels. On the attitude of respondents, it was found that 57% (61) of them agreed that under-reporting was due to complacency whereas 80.4% (86) of them agreed that it was due the lack of adequate training. On the issues of practice, the prevalence of encountering, assisting in the management, and reporting of ADRs were 26.1% (28), 17.8% (19) and 7.5% (8) respectively. Also, nurses were 1.22 times more likely to encounter a patient with ADRs and twice more likely to fill and forward ADR form than doctors during management. Respondents with more than six months but less than one year of practice experience were more likely (AOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 2.72-7.3) to encounter a patient with ADRs as compared to those with just six months of practice experience. Furthermore, male respondents were more likely (AOR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1-5.85) to encounter patients with ADRs but less likely (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.91-2.6) to fill and forward ADR form compared to their female counterparts. In conclusion, doctors and nurses at the CCTH had inadequate knowledge about ADRs and its existing pharmacovigilance systems, thus accounting for the low spontaneous ADRs reporting in the facility.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNursesPhysiciansAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospitals, TeachingHumansMalePharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID37418384
PMCPMC10328237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.