Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418261›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Use of Natural Language Processing of Patient-Initiated Electronic Health Record Messages to Identify Patients With COVID-19 Infection.

Kellen Mermin-Bunnell, Yuanda Zhu, Andrew Hornback, Gregory Damhorst, Tiffany Walker, Chad Robichaux, Lejy Mathew, Nour Jaquemet, Kourtney Peters, Theodore M Johnson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of delayed asthma diagnosis with asthma exacerbations in children.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kellen Mermin-BunnellCurrently a medical student at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yuanda ZhuSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Andrew HornbackSchool of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Gregory DamhorstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tiffany WalkerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Chad RobichauxDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Lejy MathewDivision of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nour JaquemetCurrently a medical student at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kourtney PetersEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Theodore M JohnsonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
May Dongmei WangSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Blake AndersonDivision of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Natural language processing (NLP) has the potential to enable faster treatment access by reducing clinician response time and improving electronic health record (EHR) efficiency. Objective: To develop an NLP model that can accurately classify patient-initiated EHR messages and triage COVID-19 cases to reduce clinician response time and improve access to antiviral treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study assessed development of a novel NLP framework to classify patient-initiated EHR messages and subsequently evaluate the model's accuracy. Included patients sent messages via the EHR patient portal from 5 Atlanta, Georgia, hospitals between March 30 and September 1, 2022. Assessment of the model's accuracy consisted of manual review of message contents to confirm the classification label by a team of physicians, nurses, and medical students, followed by retrospective propensity score-matched clinical outcomes analysis. Exposure: Prescription of antiviral treatment for COVID-19. Main Outcomes and Measures: The 2 primary outcomes were (1) physician-validated evaluation of the NLP model's message classification accuracy and (2) analysis of the model's potential clinical effect via increased patient access to treatment. The model classified messages into COVID-19-other (pertaining to COVID-19 but not reporting a positive test), COVID-19-positive (reporting a positive at-home COVID-19 test result), and non-COVID-19 (not pertaining to COVID-19). Results: Among 10 172 patients whose messages were included in analyses, the mean (SD) age was 58 (17) years; 6509 patients (64.0%) were women and 3663 (36.0%) were men. In terms of race and ethnicity, 2544 patients (25.0%) were African American or Black, 20 (0.2%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 1508 (14.8%) were Asian, 28 (0.3%) were Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, 5980 (58.8%) were White, 91 (0.9%) were more than 1 race or ethnicity, and 1 (0.01%) chose not to answer. The NLP model had high accuracy and sensitivity, with a macro F1 score of 94% and sensitivity of 85% for COVID-19-other, 96% for COVID-19-positive, and 100% for non-COVID-19 messages. Among the 3048 patient-generated messages reporting positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, 2982 (97.8%) were not documented in structured EHR data. Mean (SD) message response time for COVID-19-positive patients who received treatment (364.10 [784.47] minutes) was faster than for those who did not (490.38 [1132.14] minutes; P = .03). Likelihood of antiviral prescription was inversely correlated with message response time (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.00]; P = .003). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 2982 COVID-19-positive patients, a novel NLP model classified patient-initiated EHR messages reporting positive COVID-19 test results with high sensitivity. Furthermore, when responses to patient messages occurred faster, patients were more likely to receive antiviral medical prescription within the 5-day treatment window. Although additional analysis on the effect on clinical outcomes is needed, these findings represent a possible use case for integration of NLP algorithms into clinical care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatural Language ProcessingRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37418261
PMCPMC10329205
OpenAlexW4383481965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.