Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418209›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Brain Network Organization and Aging.

Feng Sang, Kai Xu, Yaojing Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Feng SangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Kai XuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yaojing ChenState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. chenyaojing@bnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent substantial progress in neuroscience, the mechanisms and principles of the complex structure, functions, and the relationship between the brain and cognitive functions have not been fully understood. The modeling method of brain network can provide a new perspective for neuroscience research, and it is possible to provide new solutions to the related research problems. On this basis, the researchers define the concept of human brain connectome to highlight and emphasize the importance of network modeling methods in neuroscience. For example, using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) technology and fiber tractography methods, a white matter connection network of the whole brain can be constructed. From the perspective of brain function, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can build the brain functional connection network. A structural covariation modeling method is used to obtain a brain structure covariation network, and it appears to reflect developmental coordination or synchronized maturation between areas of the brain. In addition, network modeling and analysis methods can also be applied to other types of image data, such as positron emission tomography (PET), electroencephalogram (EEG), and magnetoencephalography (MEG). This chapter mainly reviews the research progress of researchers on brain structure, function, and other aspects at the network level in recent years.

Indexed as

BrainWhite MatterAgingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain connectomeCognitive agingDefault mode networkWhite matter network

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.