Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418109›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024

Deep learning-based age estimation from chest CT scans.

Ghazal Azarfar, Seok-Bum Ko, Scott J Adams, Paul S Babyn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ghazal AzarfarDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. azarfar.g@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8178-6169
Seok-Bum KoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Scott J AdamsDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Paul S BabynDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedical imaging can be used to estimate a patient's biological age, which may provide complementary information to clinicians compared to chronological age. In this study, we aimed to develop a method to estimate a patient's age based on their chest CT scan. Additionally, we investigated whether chest CT estimated age is a more accurate predictor of lung cancer risk compared to chronological age.

methodsTo develop our age prediction model, we utilized composite CT images and Inception-ResNet-v2. The model was trained, validated, and tested on 13,824 chest CT scans from the National Lung Screening Trial, with 91% for training, 5% for validation, and 4% for testing. Additionally, we independently tested the model on 1849 CT scans collected locally. To assess chest CT estimated age as a risk factor for lung cancer, we computed the relative lung cancer risk between two groups. Group 1 consisted of individuals assigned a CT age older than their chronological age, while Group 2 comprised those assigned a CT age younger than their chronological age.

resultsOur analysis revealed a mean absolute error of 1.84 years and a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.97 for our local data when comparing chronological age with the estimated CT age. The model showed the most activation in the area associated with the lungs during age estimation. The relative risk for lung cancer was 1.82 (95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.02) for individuals assigned a CT age older than their chronological age compared to those assigned a CT age younger than their chronological age.

conclusionFindings suggest that chest CT age captures some aspects of biological aging and may be a more accurate predictor of lung cancer risk than chronological age. Future studies with larger and more diverse patients are required for the generalization of the interpretations.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsHumansLungRadiographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAge estimationCancer riskComputed tomographyLung cancerMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37418109
OpenAlexW4383480517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.