Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418063›Full record

ReviewEuropean geriatric medicine2023

Therapeutic dilemmas: cognitive enhancers and risk of falling in older adults-a clinical review.

Gabbie E Portlock, Matthew D Smith, Eveline P van Poelgeest, Tomas James Welsh, EuGMS Task and Finish Group on FRIDs(Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs)

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European geriatric medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dementia care and mortality in people experiencing homelessness: A matched cohort study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gabbie E PortlockBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8866-5557
Matthew D SmithBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4685-375X
Eveline P van PoelgeestAmsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2021-5602
Tomas James WelshBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. tomas.welsh@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2619-5032
EuGMS Task and Finish Group on FRIDs(Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs)
Royal United Hospital · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCognitive enhancers are the primary pharmacological therapy prescribed to those with dementia, comprising of memantine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs). The long-term cognitive and behavioural benefits of these medications, as well as their potential contribution to falls is currently debated, with recent Delphi studies being unable to reach consensus on whether these medications should be deprescribed. In this narrative clinical review, as part of a series on deprescribing in people at risk of falls, we explore the potential falls-related side effects experienced in people taking cognitive enhancers, alongside situations where deprescribing may be appropriate.

methodsWe undertook a literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar, using terms capturing falls and cognitive enhancers, as well as consulting the British National Formulary and published Summary of Medicinal Product Characteristics. These searches informed the subsequent clinical review.

resultsCognitive enhancers should be subject to regular review, including confirmation of appropriate treatment indication, and occurrence of side effects in the context of falls. AChEIs, in particular, are associated with a broad range of side effects that can contribute to increased falls risk. These include bradycardia, syncope and neuromuscular effects. Where these have been identified, deprescribing should be considered, as well as alternative treatment options. Deprescribing studies have shown mixed results, likely due to considerable methodological heterogeneity. Several suggested guidelines exist to aid deprescribing decisions, many of which are highlighted in this review.

conclusionsThe use of cognitive enhancers should be regularly reviewed and decisions to deprescribe made on a case-by-case basis, considering both the risks and benefits of stopping these medications.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsNootropic AgentsAccidental FallsAcetylcholinesteraseAgedCholinesterase InhibitorsHumansPolypharmacyAcetylcholinesteraseCholinesterase InhibitorsNootropic AgentsCognitive enhancersDementiaDeprescribingFalls

Identifiers

PMID37418063
PMCPMC10447592
OpenAlexW4383481710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.