ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric patients with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a real-world propensity score-matched cohort study.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends in research of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to CCRT alone in children and adolescents (age ≤ 18 years) with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC, stage III-IVA). MATERIALS AND
methods195 CA-LANPC patients who were treated through CCRT with or without NAC between 2008 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. A matched cohort composed of CCRT patients and NAC-CCRT patients was generated by propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:2 ratio. Survival outcomes and toxicities were compared between the CCRT group and NAC-CCRT group.
resultsOf the 195 patients, 158 (81%) received NAC plus CCRT, and 37 (19%) received CCRT alone. The NAC-CCRT group had higher EBV DNA levels (≥ 4000 copy/mL), more advanced TNM stage (stage IV disease), and lower incidence of a high radiation dose (> 6600 cGy) than the CCRT group. To avoid bias in treatment selection within retrospectively analysis, 34 patients from the CCRT group were matched with 68 patients from the NAC-CCRT group. In the matched cohort, the 5-year DMFS rate was 94.0% in the NAC-CCRT group versus 82.4% in the CCRT group, with marginal statistical significance (HR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.09-1.10; P = 0.055). During treatment, the accumulate incidence of severe acute toxicities (65.8% vs 45.9%; P = 0.037) in the NAC-CCRT group was higher than the CCRT group. However, the CCRT group had significantly higher accumulate incidence of severe late toxicities (30.3% vs 16.8%; P = 0.041) than the NAC-CCRT group.
conclusionsAddition of NAC to CCRT tended to improve long-term DMFS in CA-LANPC patients with acceptable toxicity. However, relative randomized clinical trial is still needed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.