Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418026›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Early crisis response to the COVID-19 pandemic in collective accommodation facilities for refugees : Analysis of cross-actor working arrangements from the perspective of the reception authorities in Germany].

Andreas W Gold, Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Louise Biddle, Clara Perplies, Eilin Rast, Rosa Jahn

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas W GoldSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120.
Kayvan BozorgmehrSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120.
Louise BiddleSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120.
Clara PerpliesSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120.
Eilin RastSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120.
Rosa JahnSektion Health Equity Studies und Migration, Abteilung für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120. RosaHelene.Jahn@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEBielefeld University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefugees in collective accommodation facilities are at increased risk of COVID-19-infections due to high occupancy density and shared spaces. It is unclear which (organisational) actors the reception authorities were working with in their crisis response and how. The aim of this paper is to examine the working arrangements between reception authorities and other actors involved in accommodation and (health) care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and to derive recommendations for future crisis responses.

methodsThe analysis was based on qualitative interviews with representatives responsible for the reception and accommodation of refugees (N = 46) conducted from May to July 2020. Cross-actor networks were visualised, and a qualitative analysis of the data material was carried out using the framework method.

resultsThe reception authorities worked with a multitude of other (organisational) actors. Health authorities, social workers and security personnel were mentioned most frequently. The crisis response was found to be highly heterogeneous due to its dependence on the commitment, knowledge and attitude of the individuals and organisations involved. In the absence of a coordinating actor, there may also be delays due to a "wait-and-see" attitude of the actors involved.

conclusionCrisis response in collective accommodation facilities for refugees would benefit from a clear allocation of the coordinating role to an appropriate actor. Instead of improvised ad hoc solutions, sustainable improvements in terms of transformative resilience are needed to reduce structural vulnerabilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19RefugeesDelivery of Health CareGermanyHumansPandemicsCooperationInfectious diseasesMigrationRefugee accommodationResilience

Identifiers

PMID37418026
PMCPMC10371912
OpenAlexW4383480527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.