Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37418021›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Gene therapy in ophthalmology].

Claudia S Priglinger, Maximilian J Gerhardt, Günther Rudolph, Siegfried G Priglinger, Stylianos Michalakis

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Claudia S PriglingerAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland. Claudia.Priglinger@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Maximilian J GerhardtAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Günther RudolphAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Siegfried G PriglingerAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.
Stylianos MichalakisAugenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Mathildenstr. 8, 80336, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2017 the gene therapy medication voretigene neparvovec-rzyl was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for retinal gene therapy of hereditary retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the RPE65 gene. Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl is a gene augmentation therapy using an  adeno-associated virus-based vector to express a healthy copy of the human RPE65 gene in the patient's retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells. The success of gene augmentation therapy in RPE65-linked retinal dystrophy encouraged research activities on the concept of gene supplementation to be extended to nongenetic diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration; however, it also showed that the principle of success cannot be easily extended to other retinal dystrophies. This review article presents the most commonly used principles and technologies of gene therapy and provides an overview of the current challenges and limitations. Furthermore, practice-relevant aspects of the indications and the treatment procedure are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the consideration of disease stages, especially with respect to patient's expectations and the evaluation of treatment success.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyRetinal DystrophiesGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansTreatment OutcomeAge-related macular degenerationGene delivery systemsLeber’s hereditary optic neuropathyRPE65Voretigene neparvovec-rzyl

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.