Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37417997›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Early fitting in cochlear implant surgery: preliminary results.

Arianna Soncini, Sebastiano Franzini, Francesca Di Marco, Pasquale Riccardi, Andrea Bacciu, Enrico Pasanisi, Filippo Di Lella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Next day cochlear implant switch-on: the New Zealand experience.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arianna SonciniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43121, Parma, Italy. arianna.soncini@unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1082-6598
Sebastiano FranziniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43121, Parma, Italy.
Francesca Di MarcoAdvanced Bionics Italia, Via Privata Raimondo Montecuccoli, 30, 20147, Milan, MI, Italy.
Pasquale RiccardiAdvanced Bionics Italia, Via Privata Raimondo Montecuccoli, 30, 20147, Milan, MI, Italy.
Andrea BacciuDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43121, Parma, Italy.
Enrico PasanisiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43121, Parma, Italy.
Filippo Di LellaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, via Gramsci 14, 43121, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCochlear implants are usually activated 3-5 weeks after surgery; to date, no universal protocol exists regarding switch on and fitting of these devices. The aim of the study was to assess safety and functional results of activation and fitting of cochlear implant within 24 h following surgery.

methodsIn this retrospective case-control study, 15 adult patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery, for a total of 20 cochlear implant procedures were analyzed. In particular, clinical safety and feasibility were investigated by examinating patients at activation and at each follow-up. Values of electrodes' impedance and most comfortable loudness (MCL) were analyzed from the time of surgery to 12 months after activation. Free-field pure tone average (PTA) was also recorded.

resultsNo major or minor complications were reported and all patients could perform the early fitting. Activation modality influenced impedance values only in the short term but the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Mean MCL values in the early fitting group were lower than MCL of the late fitting in all follow-up sessions, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mean PTA was lower in the early fitting group but the difference was not statistically significant (p < 0.05).

conclusionsEarly fitting of cochlear implants is safe, allows for an early rehabilitation and can have possible beneficial effects on stimulation levels and dynamic range.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAdultCase-Control StudiesElectric ImpedanceHumansRetrospective StudiesActivationCochlear implantEarly fittingElectrophysiologyImpedanceMost comfortable loudness

Identifiers

PMID37417997
PMCPMC10764441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.