ArticleJournal of neurogastroenterology and motility2023
Ethnic Differences in Anorectal Manometry Findings in Patients With Fecal Incontinence: Results From a Multiethnic Cohort According to the London Classification.
Article in Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsPooled it
- Real‑world Application of the International Anorectal Physiology Working Group Standardized Protocol and London Classification: A Multi‑country Cross‑sectional Survey of Anorectal Manometry Practice in Asia.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Validation of the London Classification for Rectal Hyposensitivity in an Anorectal Manometry Database of 2540 Patients With Functional Defecatory Disorder.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025Article
- Association Between Ethnicity and Treatment Preferences in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Clinical rates of fecal incontinence (FI) are known to vary based on race and ethnicity. It is unclear if anorectal manometry (ARM) findings in patients with FI differ based on ethnicity. Methods: High-resolution ARM studies performed between 2014-2021 due to FI at 2 hospitals with multiethnic populations were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Four hundred and seventy-nine subjects were included--87 (18.2%) Arab Israelis, 76 (15.9%) immigrants from the former Soviet Union, and 316 (66.0%) Jewish Israelis. Median age was 67 years old (76.0% women: 90.4% were parous). The Arab Israeli group had higher rates of smoking, diabetes, and obesity. Over 95% of ARM's were abnormal per the London classification including 23% with "combined anal hypotension and hypocontractility," 36% with "anal normotension with anal hypocontractility," 67% with "dyssynergia," and 65% with either "rectal hyposensation" or "borderline rectal hyposensation." On univariate analyses, significant differences between the ethnic groups were noted in the rates of "anal hypotension with normal contractility," "combined anal hypotension with anal hypocontractility," and "dyssynergia." In multivariate logistic regression analyses controlling for age, gender, parity, smoking, diabetes, and obesity, the Arab Israeli group remained several times more likely to have "combined anal hypotension and hypocontractibility" compared to the other groups. Conclusions: Ethnicity impacts ARM findings in patients with FI. The reason for this is unclear and future studies on ethnically diverse populations evaluating the clinical relevance of these findings are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.