Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37417237›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2023

Frequency and machine learning predictors of severe depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation among university students.

Nicola Meda, Susanna Pardini, Paolo Rigobello, Francesco Visioli, Caterina Novara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Predicting Suicidal Ideation in Community-based Older Adults Using Self-report Questionnaires with Machine Learning.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicola MedaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1114-3632
Susanna PardiniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-8923
Paolo RigobelloDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesco VisioliDepartment of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-1723
Caterina NovaraDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-2932
University of Padua · ITMadrid Institute for Advanced Studies · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsProspective studies on the mental health of university students highlighted a major concern. Specifically, young adults in academia are affected by markedly worse mental health status than their peers or adults in other vocations. This situation predisposes to exacerbated disability-adjusted life-years.

methodsWe enroled 1,388 students at the baseline, 557 of whom completed follow-up after 6 months, incorporating their demographic information and self-report questionnaires on depressive, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. We applied multiple regression modelling to determine associations - at baseline - between demographic factors and self-reported mental health measures and supervised machine learning algorithms to predict the risk of poorer mental health at follow-up, by leveraging the demographic and clinical information collected at baseline.

resultsApproximately one out of five students reported severe depressive symptoms and/or suicidal ideation. An association of economic worry with depression was evidenced both at baseline (when high-frequency worry odds ratio = 3.11 [1.88-5.15]) and during follow-up. The random forest algorithm exhibited high accuracy in predicting the students who maintained well-being (balanced accuracy = 0.85) or absence of suicidal ideation but low accuracy for those whose symptoms worsened (balanced accuracy = 0.49). The most important features used for prediction were the cognitive and somatic symptoms of depression. However, while the negative predictive value of worsened symptoms after 6 months of enrolment was 0.89, the positive predictive value is basically null.

conclusionsStudents' severe mental health problems reached worrying levels, and demographic factors were poor predictors of mental health outcomes. Further research including people with lived experience will be crucial to better assess students' mental health needs and improve the predictive outcome for those most at risk of worsening symptoms.

Indexed as

DepressionSuicidal IdeationHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adultcollege studentsdepressionprospective studyrandom forestsuicidality

Identifiers

PMID37417237
PMCPMC10387450
OpenAlexW4383482955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.