Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416919›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023

Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.

M V Matassini, M Marini, A Angelozzi, L Angelini, M Shkoza, P Compagnucci, U Falanga, I Battistoni, G Pongetti, M Francioni and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M V Matassini *Cardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
M Marini *Cardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
A AngelozziUnit of Cardiology and Cardiac Intensive Therapy, Cardiovascular Department, G. Mazzini Hospital, Teramo, Italy.
L AngeliniCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
M ShkozaCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
P CompagnucciCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic and Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona and Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
U FalangaCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic and Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona and Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
I BattistoniCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
G PongettiCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
M FrancioniCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
T PivaInterventional Cardiology-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
A MucajInterventional Cardiology-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
E NicoliniInterventional Cardiology-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
A MaoloInterventional Cardiology-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
M Di EusanioCardiac Surgery Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
C MunchAnaesthesia and Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
A Dello RussoCardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic and Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona and Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
G PernaCardiac Intensive Care Unit-Cardiology Division, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy.
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe syndrome with poor prognosis. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with Impella devices has emerged as an increasingly therapeutic option, unloading the failing left ventricle (LV) and improving hemodynamic status of affected patients. Impella devices should be used for the shortest time necessary to allow LV recovery because of time-dependent device-related adverse events. The weaning from Impella, however, is mostly performed in the absence of established guidelines, mainly based on the experience of the individual centres. Methods: The aim of this single center study was to retrospectively evaluate whether a multiparametrical assessment before and during Impella weaning could predict successful weaning. The primary study outcome was death occurring during Impella weaning and secondary endpoints included assessment of in-hospital outcomes. Results: Of a total of 45 patients (median age, 60 [51-66] years, 73% male) treated with an Impella device, 37 patients underwent impella weaning/removal and 9 patients (20%) died after the weaning. Non-survivors patients after impella weaning more commonly had a previous history of known heart failure ( Conclusions: This single-center experience on Impella weaning in CS showed that two easily accessible parameters as LVEF at the beginning of weaning and lactates variation (%) in the first 12-24 h from weaning begin were the most accurate predictors of death after weaning.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockcomplicationsheart failureImpellaoutcomesweaning

Identifiers

PMID37416919
PMCPMC10321515
OpenAlexW4381661354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.