Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416895›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Incidence and factors associated with newly implemented do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders among deteriorating patients after rapid response system activation: A retrospective observational study using a Japanese multicenter database.

Tatsuya Tsuji, Yoshiki Sento, Toshiyuki Nakanishi, Tetsuya Tamura, Eisuke Kako, Izumi Sato, Koji Kawakami, Tatsuya Kawasaki, Takaki Naito, Shigeki Fujitani and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya TsujiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7933-0026
Yoshiki SentoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-1793
Toshiyuki NakanishiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.
Tetsuya TamuraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.
Eisuke KakoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.
Izumi SatoDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.
Koji KawakamiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health Kyoto University Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7477-4071
Tatsuya KawasakiDepartment of Pediatric Critical Care Shizuoka Children's Hospital Shizuoka Japan.
Takaki NaitoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.
Shigeki FujitaniDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine St. Marianna University School of Medicine Kawasaki Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6327-682X
Kazuya SobueDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya City University Nagoya Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPKyoto University · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPShizuoka Children's Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The rapid response system (RRS) was initially aimed to improve patient outcomes. Recently, some studies have implicated that RRS might facilitate do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) orders among patients, their families, and healthcare providers. This study aimed to examine the incidence and factors independently associated with DNAR orders newly implemented after RRS activation among deteriorating patients. Methods: This observational study assessed patients who required RRS activation between 2012 and 2021 in Japan. We investigated patients' characteristics and the incidence of new DNAR orders after RRS activation. Furthermore, we used multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models to explore independent predictors of new DNAR orders. Results: We identified 7904 patients (median age, 72 years; 59% male) who required RRS activation at 29 facilities. Of the 7066 patients without pre-existing DNAR orders before RRS activation, 394 (5.6%) had new DNAR orders. Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression analyses revealed that new DNAR orders were associated with age category (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.17 [65-74 years old reference to 20-64 years old], aOR, 2.56; 1.92-3.42 [75-89 years old], and aOR, 6.58; 4.17-10.4 [90 years old]), malignancy (aOR, 1.82; 1.42-2.32), postoperative status (aOR, 0.45; 0.30-0.71), and National Early Warning Score 2 (aOR, 1.07; 1.02-1.12 [per 1 score]). Conclusion: The incidence of new DNAR orders was one in 18 patients after RRS activation. The factors associated with new DNAR orders were age, malignancy, postoperative status, and National Early Warning Score 2.

Indexed as

clinical deteriorationhospital rapid response teampatient care planningresuscitation ordersterminal care

Identifiers

PMID37416895
PMCPMC10321077
OpenAlexW4383270581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.