ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
Assessment of the low-field magnetic resonance imaging for the brain scan imaging of the infant hydrocephalus.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-01Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Plagiarism of Image ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In today's global clinical settings, low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology is becoming increasingly prevalent. Ensuring high-quality image acquisition is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and treatment and for evaluating the impact of poor-quality images. In this study, we explored the potential of deep learning as a diagnostic tool for improving image quality in hydrocephalus analysis planning. This could include discussions on the diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and practicality of using low-field MRI as an alternative. Methods: There are many reasons which are going to affect infant computed tomography images. These are spatial resolution, noise, and contrast between the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Now, we can enhance using the application of deep learning algorithms. Both improved and down quality were situated to the three qualified pediatric neurosurgeons comfortable with working in poor- to middle-level income countries for the analysis of clinical tools in the planning of the treatment of hydrocephalus. Results: The results predict that a picture will be classified as beneficial for hydrocephalus treatment planning, according to image resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the brain and CSF. The CNR is significantly improved by deep learning enhancement, which also improves the apparent likelihood of the image. Conclusion: However, poor-quality images might be desirable to image improved by deep learning, since those images will not offer the risk of confusing facts which could misguide the decision of the analysis of patients. Such findings support the newly introduced measurement standards in estimating the acceptable quality of images for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37416843PMC10321462W4383481192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.