Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416843›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health sciences

Assessment of the low-field magnetic resonance imaging for the brain scan imaging of the infant hydrocephalus.

Qaim Mehdi Rizvi, Sarika Singh

RetractedOpen access · greenAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qaim Mehdi RizviDepartment of Computer Applications, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial College of Engineering and Management, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sarika SinghDepartment of Computer Applications, Shri Ramswaroop Memorial College of Engineering and Management, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shri Ramswaroop Memorial University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: In today's global clinical settings, low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology is becoming increasingly prevalent. Ensuring high-quality image acquisition is crucial for accurate disease diagnosis and treatment and for evaluating the impact of poor-quality images. In this study, we explored the potential of deep learning as a diagnostic tool for improving image quality in hydrocephalus analysis planning. This could include discussions on the diagnostic accuracy, cost-effectiveness, and practicality of using low-field MRI as an alternative. Methods: There are many reasons which are going to affect infant computed tomography images. These are spatial resolution, noise, and contrast between the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Now, we can enhance using the application of deep learning algorithms. Both improved and down quality were situated to the three qualified pediatric neurosurgeons comfortable with working in poor- to middle-level income countries for the analysis of clinical tools in the planning of the treatment of hydrocephalus. Results: The results predict that a picture will be classified as beneficial for hydrocephalus treatment planning, according to image resolution and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the brain and CSF. The CNR is significantly improved by deep learning enhancement, which also improves the apparent likelihood of the image. Conclusion: However, poor-quality images might be desirable to image improved by deep learning, since those images will not offer the risk of confusing facts which could misguide the decision of the analysis of patients. Such findings support the newly introduced measurement standards in estimating the acceptable quality of images for clinical use.

Indexed as

Brain imagingcomparative modelingdeep learninghydrocephalusneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37416843
PMCPMC10321462
OpenAlexW4383481192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.