Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416825›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2023

The dynamic resilience of urban labour networks.

Xiangnan Feng, Alex Rutherford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The dynamic resilience of urban labour networks.Royal Society open science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangnan FengCentre for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, Berlin 14195, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8736-5018
Alex RutherfordCentre for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, Berlin 14195, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both cities and markets are well understood as complex systems which are amenable to analysis using physically inspired methods. Cities have shown fascinating universality with size, while labour markets modelled as networks have considerable explanatory power. Labour markets are a particularly attractive domain of study in this context due to societal importance, the influx of high-resolution data as well as exogenous influence of automation. While much previous work has studied the economic characteristics of cities as a function of size and examined the exposure of urban economies to automation, this has often been from a static perspective. In this work, we examine the diffusive properties of labour markets and examine their variance across cities. More specifically, we identify the occupations which are most important in promoting the diffusion of beneficial or deleterious properties. To this end, we propose a new measure of node centrality empSI. We find that these properties of influence vary considerably with city size.

Indexed as

complex networkslabour marketsoccupation influenceskill spreading

Identifiers

PMID37416825
PMCPMC10320346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.