Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37416693›Full record

ArticleSA journal of radiology2023

Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position.

Leoni de Man, Mari Wentzel, Cornel van Rooyen, Edwin Turton

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SA journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leoni de ManDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-5076
Mari WentzelDepartment of Clinical Imaging Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1553-5134
Cornel van RooyenDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-2957
Edwin TurtonDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6916-7691
University of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively. Objectives: This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a 'bubble test' to detect malposition and pneumothorax. Method: Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the 'bubble test' and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR. Results: Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18-56 min) ( Conclusion: This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition. Contribution: Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition.

Indexed as

central venous catheterchest X-rayCVCCXRperi-operativepositionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37416693
PMCPMC10319935
OpenAlexW4382812344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.